It's not about the tests!
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Friday, May 10, 2013
Saving the School
I just finished a book titled Saving the School by
Michael Brick. It is about the
efforts of the principal, teachers, parents and students to bring up the test
scores at Reagan High School in Austin Texas to prevent the school’s closure. It is an interesting story and I think
it really highlights the fact that it takes more than simply hard studying to
bring up scores. The principal
worked very hard throughout the year to include students and parents in her efforts
to save the school and to bring up the school’s collective image of itself from
“academically unacceptable” to “worthwhile.” This is a good read.
Brick puts together a narrative that is easy to follow and weaves
together the personal stories of the principal, a teacher, a coach, several
students and other support staff as they struggle through what could possibly
be the last year for Reagan High.
I realize that the story is abstracted from Brick’s personal
experience and written from his point of view, but it surprises me that no one
seemed angry about the fact that Reagan was deemed unacceptable because of one
point on one subgroup in the entire school even after radically bringing up
scores for all subgroups. No one
even questions whether or not the tests were bad for the students, bad for
teaching, worthwhile or even valid measures of what might happen for that
student later in life. No one ever expresses the kind of anger
they ought to be feeling over an education system that creates such a mess in
the first place.
What they did is truly laudable—make no mistake about
it. It just makes me wonder how
many folks are out there buying the federal government’s schtick about what
makes a bad school or a good school without any questions. I also have to wonder where the civil
right’s lawyers are in this mess.
Since Black and Latino students are the ones who get the shaft worst
whenever any kind of “consequences” are doled out over the “academically
unacceptable” label up to and including school closures, why aren’t there
lawyers lining up to sue the state or federal government over policies that
clearly create a greater racial divide even while purporting to narrow it.
Brick did mention the charters waiting like vultures to
swoop in and take things over once Reagan closed. He also talked about all of the companies selling their
“pass the test” study programs on back to school night. What a racket! These people get money from the federal
government for every student they enroll in their programs after the federal
government wrote the law that allows states to declare schools incompetent in
the first place. If the federal government plowed that
same amount of money into the school, they might not have dropped so low to
begin with!
The bottom line is that while I didn’t get any brilliant
teaching ideas out of reading the book, it was a very inspirational read.
Monday, May 6, 2013
And so it begins... again...
As I go through this journey, I’m having flashbacks to my
days in college learning to teach over 20 years ago. The types of learning, the approaches that we need to do
instead of “teaching to the test” are exactly what I was learning about back then. Inquiry, guided discovery, writing
across the curriculum, constructivism, cooperative learning—this stuff is so
old it’s new again.
And I did use some of these methods when I started out
teaching. Still do occasionally
(usually after the testing), so what happened? Well, it turns out that lecturing is just a lot easier than
any other method. So it’s easy and
natural to get lazy and fall into more and more lecture. For me, with six preps, it was a matter
of survival a lot of the time.
Administrators like it when they walk into your classroom
and see you lecturing and the students sitting quietly taking notes. Never mind that 80% of those same
students are completely checked out mentally—it looks good! On the other hand, say an administrator
were to walk into a classroom where 80% of the kids were engaged. Maybe they would be working on their
computers or using their smartphones to look up information. I would get slammed for the 20% of the
students who weren’t engaged. But
which is preferable? In the end, where
is more actual learning taking place?
So now I’m pulling out some of my old activities and trying
to figure out how I can incorporate them again. I’m also looking for authentic problems that I could have my
students try to solve. There are a
lot of resources out there now that weren’t available 20 years ago. Heck! I don’t think the Internet was really that available 20
years ago (I think it was sort of around, just not all that useful yet). I'm also searching for authentic projects I can use to inspire my students. The salient question is whether or not I'll be able to conjure up enough resources to get 6 math classes through a whole year.
Friday, May 3, 2013
So what is it all about?
This journey I’m embarking on has been simmering and
percolating under the surface for quite a few years now. It started, not coincidentally, with
the new and improved emphasis on standardized testing for all. At first, I didn’t really change what I
taught and things seemed to be chugging along okay. My students didn’t do great, but we are a very small school so
we didn’t have a lot of valid data to work with and I would try to read the
reports and tweak a few things every year that might help bring up scores. But nothing worked. The more I tried to get students to
score better, the worse their scores got!
Finally, in the last few years, I felt like I was just bludgeoning them
over the head with released test questions and rules and detentions and whatever
was necessary to “tighten things up,” which I was certain would ultimately lead
to better test scores. It never
did.
For the last few years, I’ve begun to recognize a disturbing
trend. Low morale among the
students caused by bludgeoning and tightening and an inordinate focus on
testing has created a backlash.
Before, I think they would sort of try. Now I think they are intentionally blowing the tests out of
anger and spite. And
honestly? I don’t blame them.
Part of me wishes my students had stellar test scores so
that I could say “look, my scores are great and I still hate testing.”
Because you know the first thing someone is gong to do is
look up my test scores and say “Who are you to speak? Look how crappy your scores are.”
Part of me wonders if I would be as magnanimous and
understanding if I had great scores.
I’d hate to be that teacher in a privileged neighborhood saying “I don’t
know what’s wrong with those other teachers—getting high test scores is
easy!” (Yeah, just move to Palo
Alto.)
So I consider it a blessing that I am responsible for such
crappy test scores because it has made me seriously reconsider the way I am
doing things and my reasons for doing them.
And when the going gets tough, what do I do? I read. So I’ll talk about some of the books that have influenced me
as I take this trip.
The first book I read is Role Reversal, by Mark Barnes. Barnes really turns teaching on its
head—no rules, no homework, no tests, no grades, huh? You’ll have to read the book if you want to know how it
turns out, but you know it is good because who would write a book about
teaching methods that don’t work?
Me? I like his
ideas. I’m not sure how I’m going
to apply them to a high school math program where I am teaching 6 different
classes. Barnes teaches middle
school English so you can see I’ve got my work cut out for me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)